Search for: "People v. Harper" Results 41 - 60 of 419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 9:35 am by Lawrence Solum
Then it will discuss the history of voter access in the United States, with a focus on Harper v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 8:29 pm by Alfred Brophy
It's my great pleasure to introduce a blog symposium on Harper Lee's Go Set a Watchman, which we'll be running this week at the faculty lounge. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
Harper and other recent election law controversies (more on this below). [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bennett Capers's "The Crime of Loving: Loving, Lawrence, and Beyond," which appears in Loving v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:04 pm
Marshalling primary sources, it reveals how the Supreme Court's opinion in Harper v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 11:28 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Those who weighed in were Dana Bliss, editor, Oxford University Press; Amanda Cook, v-p and editorial director, Crown; Tara Grove, editor-in-chief, New Press; Hollis Heimbouch, senior v-p and publisher, Harper Business; Sarah Humphreville, editor, Oxford University Press; Steve Piersanti, founder and editor, Berrett-Koehler; Lynne Rienner, president and editorial director, Lynne Rienner; and Glenn Yeffeth, publisher, BenBella…” [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]