Search for: "People v. Harris"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am
“As an Uber driver this is someone, they thought they had reason to trust,” said Harris County Assistant District Attorney Barbara Phillips. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am
“As an Uber driver this is someone, they thought they had reason to trust,” said Harris County Assistant District Attorney Barbara Phillips. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am
Now that people have died, we'll see litigation surrounding this. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Young v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Officer of the Harris County, Tex., Constable's Office tases gentleman during traffic stop. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
All too often, as in Gonzales v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
Prince Harry was awarded £140,600 in damages to compensate him for the distressed he suffered as a result of the phone hacking. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
The People have spoken. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
