Search for: "People v. Hart" Results 181 - 200 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The ICO has set out how seven of the UK’s political parties need to improve the way they handle people’s personal data after assessing how they manage data protection. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am by Chris Carey
Hart, got 8,000 SinoCoking shares and 4,000 warrants in the placement. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
The Act prescribes the right of people in Scotland to claim damages for an asbestos-related condition. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, based in Chicago, ruled on April 23 in Nuxoll v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
Whilst Dominic Carman, writing in the Guardian, purports to outline some of Leveson’s flaws, the appointment of a judge to preside over the Inquiry has led Joshua Rozenberg to write that “when people can no longer trust the press, police or politicians, only a judge will do. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
This is one of the reported 50 cases being fought by the Christian Legal Centre in US inspired tactic against ‘sidelining’ of people with ‘traditional biblical views’. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:03 pm
Hart at 1649 hours, with Eric J. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
 June 20, 2011 David Hart QC Filed under: In the news Tagged: human rights, roundup [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Enemy of the People: what price water information – David Hart QC, UK Human Rights Blog – Discussed the decision of the Tribunal in Smartsource v Information Commissioner [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23 November 2010 as to whether information about water and wastewater billing etc was environmental information which involved determining whether water companies and sewage undertakers were “public authorities” for the purposes of the EIR. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Administrator
If many people find it convenient, enjoyable, or profitable to do things that hurt animals, those things are not legally cruel. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
” His adversary, Professor Herbert Hart, took much the same position as Mill. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They are literally the only people whose opinions genuinely count in his version of the law. [read post]