Search for: "People v. Hart" Results 181 - 200 of 430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
The opposing people put up by the second defendant are two company liquidators, Mr Olde and Mr Landrey. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm by Stephen Griffin
”  Dorf’s nonoriginalist alternative ground, very popular among living constitutionalists, is the contemporary acceptance of the Constitution by the people of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
Following Eleonora's post earlier this week on the recent Opinion of the European Copyright Society in a reference for a preliminary ruling currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), this being HP Belgium v Reprobel, today the IPKat is delighted to host a guest contribution by Dr Ulrich Börger (Harte-Bavendamm) on a recent Austrian case on the very topic of levies, in which he acted for one of the parties to… [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
”[21] The hemorrhagic colitis caused by E. coli O157:H7 is characterized by severe abdominal cramps, diarrhea that typically turns bloody within twenty-four hours, and sometimes fevers.[22] The typical incubation period—which is to say the time from exposure to the onset of symptoms—in outbreaks is usually reported as three to eight days.[23] Infection can occur in people of all ages but is most common in children.[24] The duration of an uncomplicated illness can range… [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 3:58 am by Steve Cornforth
This was a case called Bolam v Friern Hospitals Management Committee. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am by INFORRM
Another legal principle relied upon by the judge founded on the famous case of Armory v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm by Eric Turkewitz
Rakofsky sued so many people and companies that discussed what happened that the suit was instantly dubbed Rakofsky v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]