Search for: "People v. Hart" Results 201 - 220 of 434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
The Act prescribes the right of people in Scotland to claim damages for an asbestos-related condition. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, based in Chicago, ruled on April 23 in Nuxoll v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
Whilst Dominic Carman, writing in the Guardian, purports to outline some of Leveson’s flaws, the appointment of a judge to preside over the Inquiry has led Joshua Rozenberg to write that “when people can no longer trust the press, police or politicians, only a judge will do. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
This is one of the reported 50 cases being fought by the Christian Legal Centre in US inspired tactic against ‘sidelining’ of people with ‘traditional biblical views’. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am by Adam Wagner
In Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights found, unanimously, a violation of article 10 ECHR. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:03 pm
Hart at 1649 hours, with Eric J. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
 June 20, 2011 David Hart QC Filed under: In the news Tagged: human rights, roundup [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Enemy of the People: what price water information – David Hart QC, UK Human Rights Blog – Discussed the decision of the Tribunal in Smartsource v Information Commissioner [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23 November 2010 as to whether information about water and wastewater billing etc was environmental information which involved determining whether water companies and sewage undertakers were “public authorities” for the purposes of the EIR. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Climate change More from the UKHRB – this time, a post by David Hart QC on the fascinating question of whether climate change is a human rights issue. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Administrator
If many people find it convenient, enjoyable, or profitable to do things that hurt animals, those things are not legally cruel. [read post]