Search for: "People v. Hart" Results 281 - 300 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The ICO concluded that there is always meaningful human involvement in the decision-making process but recommended that local authorities identify risks to people’s privacy, maintain transparency and ensure GDPR compliance. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Bullough details the criticism this incident received in Angola, where more than half the people live in poverty. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
” Attitude to Human Rights A number of people have been talking and thinking this week about human rights more broadly, and our attitude towards them. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
This case is briefly commented on by Ian McDonald, writing for Liberty, who considers the decision a vindication of the right to free speech – that people should, in a democratic society, be allowed to voice even insulting opinions without fear of reprisal. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
” Copyhype’s Terry Hart had a post a week later discussing the infringement-as-theft meme, mentioning the fact that even Justice Breyer, a copyright skeptic, had referred to deliberate infringement as “garden-variety theft. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:12 am by New Books Script
JZ 6368 T48 2011 The people vs. the state : reflections on UN authority, US power and the responsibility to protect Ramesh Thakur. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
’ (Governing by Numbers: Delegated Legislation and Everyday Policymaking (Hart Publishing, 2001) p.101 and ch.5 generally). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
First, the criminal defamation statute arguably fails to provide "people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" and what speech is acceptable…. [read post]