Search for: "People v. Hart" Results 281 - 300 of 383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 4:25 pm by Attorney Theodore Ronca
The “Nickel” claims, as well as the earlier “Hart v Pageprint/De Kalb”, 6 AD 3d 947, reversed closing settlements because the Board procedure of having a hearing prior to approving a closing was not followed. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
This is one of the reported 50 cases being fought by the Christian Legal Centre in US inspired tactic against ‘sidelining’ of people with ‘traditional biblical views’. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by GuestPost
We are pleased to welcome the latest post in our series of  responses to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in A, B & C v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Enemy of the People: what price water information – David Hart QC, UK Human Rights Blog – Discussed the decision of the Tribunal in Smartsource v Information Commissioner [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23 November 2010 as to whether information about water and wastewater billing etc was environmental information which involved determining whether water companies and sewage undertakers were “public authorities” for the purposes of the EIR. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:20 pm by Orin Kerr
Finally, he litigated and won New York Times v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Lexington Books, c2010.ChinaKNQ500 .L53 2010The draft civil code of the People's Republic of China : English translation / (prepared by the Legislative Research Group of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) ; by Liang Huixing ; translated from the Chinese by Junwei Fu ... [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:46 pm by Madelaine Lane
Hart, Case No. 141482, in light of People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Colin Murray
Article 3 of Protocol 1 requires that states hold “free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature” (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Because it allows people to -gasp- criticize people like them aloud. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:57 am by Jonathan Bailey
He posted a lengthy and well-thought out piece about using the word to describe copyright infringement, pointing out that the fact it is not legally correct does not prevent people from using the term colloquially.He takes a pretty good stab at those who cite Dowling v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am by Chris Carey
Hart, got 8,000 SinoCoking shares and 4,000 warrants in the placement. [read post]