Search for: "People v. Hawkins"
Results 1 - 20
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2024, 8:30 am
Case citation: Hawkins v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
In People v Hawkins (2008 NY Slip Op 09254 [11/25/08]) the Court of Appeals provided counsel with further guidance as to what is required to preserve errors for review as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:31 pm
However, this ground was without merit as a deficiency in the chain of custody did not affect the admissibility but only affected the weight of the evidence as stated in the People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d at 494. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
First, on June 5, 2009 in People v Joseph (63 AD3d 1658 [June 5, 2009]), then on June 12, 2009, in People v Mills (63 AD3d 1717 [June 12, 2009]) and, again on July 10, 2009 in People v Reome (2009 NY Slip Op 05804 [July 10, 2009]).Since 1995 there have been more than 1500 such decisions statewide. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:07 am
Hawkins, Aug. 14, 2014, Mississippi Supreme Court More Blog Entries:Harmon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 4:40 am
Hobbs (Voting Rights Act)Hawkins v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
Choy, People v Hawkins and People v White. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 am
Hawkins, supra. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:21 am
If you took the argument Monday morning in Hawkins v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:51 am
People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:35 pm
Hobbs (Voting Rights Act)Hawkins v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
We're better at catching people who use methamphetamine than we are are catching terrorists. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:45 pm
Therefore, any deficiencies in the chain of custody went only to the weight to be given to the evidence, not its admissibility as was also held in People v Hawkins. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:53 pm
Judge Hawkins, who joined the opinion, is also senior. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 11:10 am
The case is State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
"That was Judges Nguyen, Hawkins and Tashima. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
See Hawkins v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
Furthermore, the attorney's conduct did not consist of "egregious and prejudicial error such that defendant did not receive a fair trial" (People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998], citing People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 188-189 [1994]), but rather "viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal[s] that the attorney provided meaningful representation" (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). [read post]
