Search for: "People v. Hawkins" Results 1 - 20 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
In People v Hawkins (2008 NY Slip Op 09254 [11/25/08]) the Court of Appeals provided counsel with further guidance as to what is required to preserve errors for review as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, this ground was without merit as a deficiency in the chain of custody did not affect the admissibility but only affected the weight of the evidence as stated in the People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d at 494. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
First, on June 5, 2009 in People v Joseph (63 AD3d 1658 [June 5, 2009]), then on June 12, 2009, in People v Mills (63 AD3d 1717 [June 12, 2009]) and, again on July 10, 2009 in People v Reome (2009 NY Slip Op 05804 [July 10, 2009]).Since 1995 there have been more than 1500 such decisions statewide. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:12 am
The panel consisted of Judges Hawkins, McKeown, and Tallman. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
 But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
We're better at catching people who use methamphetamine than we are are catching terrorists. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:45 pm
Therefore, any deficiencies in the chain of custody went only to the weight to be given to the evidence, not its admissibility as was also held in People v Hawkins. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:53 pm
Judge Hawkins, who joined the opinion, is also senior. [read post]