Search for: "People v. Henderson" Results 221 - 240 of 396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The Council takes the view that homeless applicants will not jump to the top of the housing queue with the result that people who are overcrowded or badly housed for medical or social reasons move down the list. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The Council takes the view that homeless applicants will not jump to the top of the housing queue with the result that people who are overcrowded or badly housed for medical or social reasons move down the list. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:21 am by Carlos A. Kelly
In 2006, the Florida Legislature enacted several statutes in response to the United States Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:59 pm
If he would haven’t been there, there could have been some innocent people shot…I heard pop, pop; then pop pop pop, all at once. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, (heard 3 April 2012 by Maurice Kay and Hooper LJJ and Henderson J) will be handed down on 19 July 2012. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:30 am by Ken Lammers
The test as to whether an act was a common law criminal trespass can be found in Henderson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
How about asking meat blender suppliers to compensate people injured by commercial blenders? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by INFORRM
On 11 July 2012, there are applications in the cases of Qadir v Associated Newspapers and Tilbrook v Parr. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]