Search for: "People v. Henderson" Results 261 - 280 of 396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2020, 5:02 am by Will Baude
And we have the rise of explicit judicial supremacy in Cooper v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, heard 3… [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:09 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Arnold Kling and David Henderson at Econlog; Skip Oliva digs into the legal issues; Paul Pillar on the integrity of policy analysis; Gene Healy responds to the view from Koch. [read post]
(Note:  Miller Starr Regalia attorneys Ken Stahl and Matt Henderson represented intervenors YIMBY Law and People for Housing Orange County (a chapter of YIMBY Action) in the Olen litigation.) [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
OF COURSE it’s moderated – you people are not responsible for any legal actions, the paper is… think before you ink“. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The Council takes the view that homeless applicants will not jump to the top of the housing queue with the result that people who are overcrowded or badly housed for medical or social reasons move down the list. [read post]