Search for: "People v. Henderson" Results 61 - 80 of 345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2021, 10:53 am by Ilya Somin
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 11:24 am by Eric Goldman
Classmates Section 230 Preempts Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Claims–Henderson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:15 am by Kevin
Henderson contained a number of pop-culture references, including one that made clear he’s not a fan of the third trilogy. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, Temi Orekunrin and Megan O’Neill of CMS summarise the second day of submissions in the appeal of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved On Tuesday 27 April 201 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P,  Henderson and Warby LJJ) heard the appeal in case of Riley v Sivier. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson and Zainab Hodgson of CMS summarise the first day of submissions in the appeal of Lloyd v Google LLC, which concerns a claim alleging that the appellant (‘Google’) breached its duties as a data controller to over 4m Apple iPhone users during a period of some months in 2011- 2012, when Google was able to collect and use their browser generated information. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
The proposed class is vast, comprising an estimated 46.2 million people. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm
It's struck me as strange as I was reading it that this opinion referred to the defendant by his last name (Henderson) and the key male witness the same way (Aguilar), yet referred to the key female witness by only her first name (Tiffany).It may perhaps be that the panel doesn't know Tiffany's last name. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am by Rose Hughes
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
Bigamy was for a long time a state crime; and it was declared a federal crime in 1862 by the Morrill Act, a law aimed specifically at the Mormons that was upheld by the Supreme Court in 1878 in Reynolds v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
This is because the case will be suitable to proceed as a class action if some issues, including common impact, may be resolved for a class of people using common evidence at a common issues trial. [read post]