Search for: "People v. Henning" Results 321 - 340 of 479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2013, 6:10 am by Jamison Koehler
” The key case in Maryland on this doctrine is Atkinson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
[W]hen JH opened her iTunes, she noticed another user's library -- `Dad's LimeWire Tunes’ -- was available for sharing. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:56 am
 The appellate division was referred to as 'the fox [watching] the hen house.' Appellant demanded that each appellate judge disclose for the record whether he had discussed the case with the trial court, saying: 'But it’s common knowledge in the legal community, and you would be insulting me if you suggested otherwise, for us to believe that you judges don’t talk like women in a sewing circle about us lawyers. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:34 am by SHG
" News like this can't help but raise thoughts of the 1976 decision, Tarasoff v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
the court has no discretion; concurrent sentences are mandated' " (People v Roundtree, 75 AD3d 1136, 1138, lv denied 15 NY3d 855, quoting People v Hamilton, 4 NY3d 654, 658; see People v Cromwell, 71 AD3d 414, 415, lv denied 15 NY3d 803; People v Mercer, 66 AD3d 1368, 1370, lv denied 13 NY3d 940). [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
The most recent post from Anonymous Assistant: Hen Dos and Hen Don’ts. [read post]