Search for: "People v. Hickman" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 1:12 pm
 Hickman, which discusses a recent California Supreme Court opinion,  People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:26 am
Sure, there are pretty certain votes in en banc criminal cases, but there's a decent middle -- a fair number of reasonable people who can be swayed.So, as it turns out, it's indeed a close case: the final vote is 7-4. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
U.S. here, here] “From Chevron to ‘Consent of the Governed'” [David Schoenbrod, Cato Regulation magazine; Cato panel discussion video with Adam White, David Doniger, Shapiro and Yeatman; Federalist Society panel discussion video with Mark Chenoweth, Doniger, Kristin Hickman, Schoenbrod, Jennifer Mascott] “Recognizing the Congressional Review Act’s Full Potential” [Jonathan Wood, Federalist Society, earlier] “Idaho is the only state in the… [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:02 am by INFORRM
  They were, in descending order: Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench The Police Tip-Off and Cliff Richard – Dominic Crossley Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
v=8BhHTA6Gzn0&feature=related In Clive we had a bicyclist, Laura Ridgway of West Des Moines who was injured after a car reportedly driven by Larry Norrell didn't yield at the intersection of Hickman Road and Northwest 156th Street on the Tuesday proceeding May 17, 2011 at around 7:12 a.m. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Rev. 1223, 1223 (2013); see also, e.g., Hickman & Krueger, In Search of the Modern Skidmore Standard, 107 Colum. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
Greg Stohr of Bloomberg reports that the ruling “may prevent the collection of $1 billion from people who used a tax shelter popular in the late 1990s and early 2000s” while Kristen Hickman and Steve Johnson analyze the decision at TaxProf Blog. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am by Alexander Vindman
Unlike with Trump in the impeachment trial, the First Amendment clearly does apply here, and it has a very high standard for incitement under Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 Why should they be expected to make a decision about taking a deposition until they know what the people are going to say? [read post]