Search for: "People v. Hill" Results 201 - 220 of 2,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm by Steven M. Gursten
” Personal injury lawyers and people injured in car accidents must meet this test under McCormick v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
The court commented that this alteration to the videotape made what actually transpired during that incident unclear and equivocal.* In contrast, in People v Hill, a criminal action, the Appellate Division said that Supreme Court “properly denied defendant's suppression [of video tape evidence] motion, explaining that the surveillance video tape “was adequately authenticated by the testimony of a detective who, while working a second job for a security… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
When, in pursuit of (usually) legitimate objectives, the government goes way, way too far.This is one of those times.A company opened a business in Beverley Hills that rented out safe deposit boxes, with incredibly tight security. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:45 am by Elliot Setzer
Charlotte Butash provided a preview of the en banc oral arguments in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am by Nasir Pasha, Esq.
At the end of each day, Quickly keeps all the fares from the people he picked up during the day. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:21 am
Some notable quotables from the discussion: *"The courts in the era of Thurgood Marshall and Brown v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:45 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Kashmir Hill writes at her Forbes blog on the good news from yesterday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing markup of amendments to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: No, Faking Your Name On Facebook Will Not Be A Felony.Legal scholar Orin Kerr wrote an alarming op-ed in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, warning people that “faking your name on Facebook could be a felony” when the law is changed. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
  Imagine that the jury had collectively gone to the scene and reenacted the murder and concluded, yep, given the topography of the area, it'd have taken two people to drag someone up the hill and kill them, despite the fact that there was no evidence at trial at all about whether the area had hills, and convicted the defendant accordingly. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm by joel
Monday, March 26th 2012 by Tyler Hill   Abstract             The advent of social media in the workplace has triggered a host of newfound legal ambiguities that most recently have been illuminated in Phonedog v. [read post]