Search for: "People v. Hill"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2010, 10:35 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
After all, didn't the Supreme Court uphold speech restrictions outside abortion clinics in the case of Hill v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
City Upon the Hill As Americans, we are fond of perpetuating our own storybook myth, beginning with the pilgrims in 1620 and followed by the Puritans, that there is a mythical “city upon a hill,” as their governor John Winthrop called it, where there is a “melting pot” of all people who can come and practice their own faith. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
In Gamble v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:20 pm
Tinklenberg (Speedy Trial Act), and Fowler v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:29 pm
It’s a game of two halves Four games into my local Man v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
At the end of each day, Quickly keeps all the fares from the people he picked up during the day. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:33 am
I am sure that the Blogosphere will be blogging about this op-ed by Judge Morris Hoffman, who conducted an empirical study which analyzed sentences handed out to people represented by public defenders v. privately retained counsel. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
We're a city on a hill, a shining beacon to the world, right? [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 9:28 am
In Two Rivers Bank and Trust v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm
Approximately Thirteen Unoccupied Burial Plots Situated at Forest Lawn Memorial Park’s Hollywood Hills Cemetery Located in Los Angeles, California. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
Please join me as we take a trip deep into the weeds.Fact - the People are required to serve a 710.30 notice when they intend to use statements of the defendant, which meet other criteria which will not be enumerated here.Fact - Sometimes the People do not serve a 710.30 notice as to some or all statements meeting those criteria.Fact - The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, has ruled that using such statements for the purpose of impeachment is perfectly okay even so… [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In 1989, in City of Richmond v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 5:10 am
The article begins, "So many people came to listen to lawyers argue the death penalty appeal of convicted Chino Hills murderer Kevin Cooper that dozens of overflow spectators had to watch from the courthouse cafeteria on a closed-circuit television. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon Civic… [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 8:16 am
This was the issue before the Third Department yesterday in People v Cabrera, 2007 NY Slip Op 03798. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:46 am
US, People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
Mitchell II: 76 percent to 24 percent Proves once again that people just don’t like paying taxes. [read post]
