Search for: "People v. Hill" Results 21 - 40 of 1,564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In 1985 the Public Defender Services and ACLU sued Oak Hill for its poor services to youth in a case known as Jerry M. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Smits writes that “Of all the white people’s activities in Indian country none enraged and disheartened the Native Americans more than the destruction of their buffalo. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Smits writes that “Of all the white people’s activities in Indian country none enraged and disheartened the Native Americans more than the destruction of their buffalo. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
NO-FAULT - VERIFICATION - MEDICAL NECESSITY - WORKERS' COMPENSATION FEE SCHEDULELenox Hill Radiology a/a/o Jose Almadovar v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 In this case, the Court will have the opportunity to limit, or overrule, Hill v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:17 pm by Cory Doctorow
One way to address the problem is the very useful notion of "hill-climbing. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am by SHG
Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill(R) took the position in Box v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Water that is diverted for purposes of irrigation, however, 'is not deemed severed and thus remains [realty]' (13 Witkin, supra, § 91, p. 113); 'In the case of water for irrigation, delivered in ditches or pipes, the severance does not take place at all'.In a usually overlooked part of People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 5:58 pm by Andrew Koppelman
The Supreme Court's decision in Bostock v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:19 am by Legal Talk Network
The recent turmoil on Capitol Hill and downgrading of the U.S. credit rating by the Standard and Poor’s has been un-nerving, causing an environment of uncertainty, but what is the real story? [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
Just a quick post about the Hill v Haines case, which went before the Court of Appeal this week, and which I've mentioned previously. [read post]