Search for: "People v. Hill" Results 81 - 100 of 2,085
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2022, 5:38 am by Steve Lubet
My new column at The Hill explains the parallels between the recent SCOTUS opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:45 pm by Allan Blutstein
By Thomas Sussman & Lisa Rosenberg, The Hill, June 3, 2019Recently, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that will probably fly under most people’s radar, but which may have dire consequences for the public, the press and even the free market.The case, Food Marketing Institute (FMI) v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon Civic… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The 9th Circuit also ruled in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:06 am by Tom Smith
Three decades of remorseless ideological and cultural combat—over Robert Bork, over Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill, over Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich, over Bush v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:01 pm by Unknown
Traditional Village of Togiak (Banishment; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:25 am
View the article here 03/06/2009 By Karamagi Rujumba, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Robert V. [read post]
Court documents filed in the Walters v State of Western Australia case detail substantial allegations of abuse and human rights violations against children held at the Banksia Hill Detention Centre. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:16 am
The Court held that since, pursuant to Penal Law § 70.25 [2-a], the consecutive sentence was a direct consequence of the plea, the court's failure to advise the defendant at the time of the plea that his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction prevented his plea from being knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Hill,9 NY3d 189, 191 [2007], cert denied 553 US â€â [read post]