Search for: "People v. Hill (1970)" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:22 am by Jon Rehm
Hill along with Lopez and Morrison, most people would agree that the Supreme Court’s law on interstate commerce is a jumbled mess. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
He first came into the public eye in October 1991, when Anita Hill accused him of sexual harassment. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
" But the First Amendment protects people's right to speak about others, including using others' images and "information about" them. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The sheer number of allegations has made some people more willing to believe women. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
And so he went to lawmakers on Capitol Hill with a plea: Do not grant immunity to witnesses in exchange for their testimony if you ever want anyone brought to justice. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]