Search for: "People v. Hill (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Water that is diverted for purposes of irrigation, however, 'is not deemed severed and thus remains [realty]' (13 Witkin, supra, § 91, p. 113); 'In the case of water for irrigation, delivered in ditches or pipes, the severance does not take place at all'.In a usually overlooked part of People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Smits writes that “Of all the white people’s activities in Indian country none enraged and disheartened the Native Americans more than the destruction of their buffalo. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am by Brian Shiffrin
Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751 (1983), what evidentiary objections to raise, see Henry v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
Switzer, a case in which the Court will grapple with whether a prisoner may bring a claim under Section 1983 to gain access to biological evidence for DNA testing. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
Petitioners John and Irene Yee own the Friendly Hills and Sunset Terrace Mobile Home Parks, both of which are located in the city of Escondido. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:11 am
Back in September, my colleague Jessie Hill previewed the case for SCOTUSBlog here. [read post]