Search for: "People v. Holbrook"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:01 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:15 am
Remember State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:05 pm
Jonathan Holbrook wrote about “ghost guns” and other privately made guns here. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 3:45 pm
" Fulton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
Crump, 376 N.C. at 393; see also this blog post from my colleague Jonathan Holbrook summarizing the opinion. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
The summaries were prepared by Shea Denning, Jamie Markham, Chris Tyner, Gabrielle Supak, and Jonathan Holbrook. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
The summaries were prepared by Shea Denning, Chris Tyner, and Jonathan Holbrook. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am
A couple blog posts worth checking out are Tim Holbrook's and Tom Cotter's. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
In last year, Sofa Works v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
Holbrook, that it had considered at eight prior conferences. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Holbrook, 15-7848, has now earned its seventh relist. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm
The total rents from patents are larger than the total costs; similarly true for university patent licensing income v. costs overall, even w/a lot of losers. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
This week brought good news for the petitioners’ counsel in a pair of one-time relists – if “lucky” can really be used to describe people who will spend their summer restricted by SCOTUS briefs; deep down, they envy those who retain their freedom. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
The question in this case is whether this rule applies only to first assistants under the default rule, or whether it also applies to the alternative people the president can designate. [read post]
