Search for: "People v. Holbrook" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am by Michael Risch
A couple blog posts worth checking out are Tim Holbrook's and Tom Cotter's. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am by Michael Risch
A couple blog posts worth checking out are Tim Holbrook's and Tom Cotter's. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am by Edith Roberts
Holbrook, that it had considered at eight prior conferences. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Holbrook, 15-7848, has now earned its seventh relist. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The total rents from patents are larger than the total costs; similarly true for university patent licensing income v. costs overall, even w/a lot of losers. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
This week brought good news for the petitioners’ counsel in a pair of one-time relists – if “lucky” can really be used to describe people who will spend their summer restricted by SCOTUS briefs; deep down, they envy those who retain their freedom. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
The question in this case is whether this rule applies only to first assistants under the default rule, or whether it also applies to the alternative people the president can designate. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Holbrook, 15-7848, yet another a capital case that’s now on its second relist. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
Holbrook, 15-7848, a capital case (another one?) [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Holbrook: The book is mixed property, both rights at once—hard to apply the real property matrix to that. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
People dabbling out of their garages (or motorcycle shops) were not such a threat.As to indirect infringement, Holbrook writes:Alternatively, patent owners could go after the people facilitating the infringement. [read post]