Search for: "People v. Hollis" Results 21 - 40 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
So Judge Holly Thomas drops the following footnote:"Jiaxing did not enter an appearance in this matter and therefore has not provided briefing in opposition to San Antonio’s position. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:03 am
"Earlier coverage of the case is here; more at the ScotusWiki page for Wood v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
At least 147 people were sickened, and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:19 am by Edwin Moloy
The majority of this collection consists of research material collected by Toobin for his books, The Run of His Life: The People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 11:28 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Those who weighed in were Dana Bliss, editor, Oxford University Press; Amanda Cook, v-p and editorial director, Crown; Tara Grove, editor-in-chief, New Press; Hollis Heimbouch, senior v-p and publisher, Harper Business; Sarah Humphreville, editor, Oxford University Press; Steve Piersanti, founder and editor, Berrett-Koehler; Lynne Rienner, president and editorial director, Lynne Rienner; and Glenn Yeffeth, publisher, BenBella…” [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:08 am by Chris Castle
“We never get accustomed to being less important to other people than they are to us. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Elisabeth Fontugne, Respecting Religion: How Court and Congress Impermissibly Treaded on Sacred Ground to the People's Detriment, (December 15, 2015).Jared A. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:24 am by Walter Olson
In the new Supreme Court case of Township of Mount Holly v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 1:13 pm
The woman, Holly Mitchell, lived with a convicted sex offender and let her children stay with the man while she was at work.Mitchell appealed her conviction, claiming the state's law is unconstitutional because it treats people who are not married and living with a sex offender differently than people who are married and living with a sex offender.The Supreme Court on Friday rejected that argument, saying it's reasonable to believe that an unmarried parent living… [read post]