Search for: "People v. Holmes" Results 1 - 20 of 574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 3:38 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Holmes is accused of killing and injuring numerous people in a movie theater in Aurora, CO in 2012. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
 As students of the First Amendment know, in less than a year's time, Holmes went from authoring Debs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 12:30 pm
Holm stole "a television, valued at $662.23, and three boxes of golf balls, valued at $50 each, from the Santa Rosa Golf and Country Club. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by alysondrake
Eleanor Holmes Norton-“I defended the First Amendment, and you seldom get to defend the First Amendment by defending people you like … You don’t know whether the First Amendment is alive and well until it is tested by people with despicable ideas. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
Some people think of this as a sign of courage; others as an unwarranted smugness. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am by Ben
But in the twilight of his life, as people continue to look to him for answers, Holmes revisits a case that may provide him with answers of his own to questions he didn’t even know he was asking–about life, about love, and about the limits of the mind’s ability to know. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
Felix Frankfurter was zealous in guarding Holmes’ reputation after Holmes’ death in 1935 and decided that only the official biographer he anointed in 1939 to carry out the task, Mark Howe of the Harvard Law School, would have access to Holmes’ papers. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:53 pm
Watson in a Train Cabin (public domain) So holds Judge Posner’s opinion for the Seventh Circuit in Klinger v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:27 am
How does Judge Posner reconcile his great fondness and respect for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
 Most of us have become wary of Holmes's full throated majoritarianism and his suggestion that judges should basically be indifferent to the tyrannical aspects of government (save, perhaps, when regulating the speech at least of "puny anonymities," though not, say, Eugene V. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:48 am by Jack Sharman
There are people right now with “Left” and “Right” written on their shoes, and even when they get that wrong they’re still doing better than the people who call a glass of gin a martini because they’ve at least remembered both of the relevant items. [read post]