Search for: "People v. Hooker" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2012, 7:34 am
Hooker spoke with them after being arrested, and claimed two people he knew asked him to bring the computer into the store. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:00 pm
But, yes, "Exotic Secrets" was one of those "escort" services that, wouldn't you know it, often provided sex to its clients.Here are the additional, juicy, details regarding street hookers versus hookers you find in the Yellow Pages:"Mayo ran an escort service, Exotic Secrets. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
., their husband) drives it to pick up a hooker -- something the owner totally doesn't benefit from and would surely prevent if they could. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am by admin
Long-time District Court Judge Owen Panner recently granted a foreclosed-upon couple declaratory judgment against MERS in Hooker v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hooker, The Evolution of Singapore's Common Law Fiqh, 1957-2013, (Australian Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 17, No. 1, Article 9, 2016).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Steven P. [read post]
1 May 2008, 5:38 pm
First of all, 13,500 people do not die in drunk driving crashes. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am by admin
Long-time District Court Judge Owen Panner recently granted a foreclosed-upon couple declaratory judgment against MERS in Hooker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:11 am
British tabloid newspaper publishing practices are in the news again, following the judgment in yesterday's highly-publicised ruling of Mr Justice Eady in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB). [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:17 am by Tessa Shepperson
The case, reported on Nearly Legal is called Arkin v Marshall and involves two claims for possession on residential mortgages, apparently by a receiver. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:17 am by Tessa Shepperson
The case, reported on Nearly Legal is called Arkin v Marshall and involves two claims for possession on residential mortgages, apparently by a receiver. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 8:59 am by Jason Krebs
The "loophole" the article references related to Robinson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:17 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In re Tax Appeal of Reel Hooker Sportfishing, Inc., No. 29598 (May 28, 2010). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Matthew Streb
The Supreme Court’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:11 am by Tessa Shepperson
July Justin Bates wrote a post for us on a new case, Jarvis v. [read post]