Search for: "People v. Hopkins" Results 1 - 20 of 382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 10:53 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
 People come from all over the world to get the best medical care that Hopkins can provide. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 10:53 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
 People come from all over the world to get the best medical care that Hopkins can provide. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:52 am by INFORRM
The case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins concerns a tweet by the defendant, Daily Mail columnist, Katie Hopkins about the claimant, food writer Jack Monroe, sent on 18 May 2015. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by INFORRM
This is the Appendix to the Judgment in Monroe v Hopkins, handed down on 10 March 2017. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Ms Hopkins’ argument against the occurrence of serious harm on the basis that the Tweets were only made to people whose opinions about Ms Monroe couldn’t be shifted was rejected. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:06 am by INFORRM
The trial of the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins concluded on Wednesday 1 March 2017, Day 3 of the trial before Mr Justice Warby in Court 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 11:39 am by Unknown
United States (Assimilative Crimes Act) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlJohnson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
TITLE: Three Generations, No Imbeciles SUBTITLE: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 February 2017, Warby J will hear the much anticipated trial in the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by INFORRM
Last month, Mr Justice Warby handed down judgment in Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB), the first libel case to consider the “serious harm” test under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 within the context of a social media post. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The “Twitter Libel” case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins continued to take the media law headlines this week. [read post]