Search for: "People v. Horton" Results 1 - 20 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 9:44 am by admin
It is the result of a bargain made between Tim Hortons and its franchisees whereby franchisees give up the autonomy they would have as independent business people and agree to buy their products from suppliers and at prices specified by Tim Hortons. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:22 am
Horton from the perspective of the gay rights/gay marriage issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:47 am by admin
It is the result of a bargain made between Tim Hortons and its franchisees whereby franchisees give up the autonomy they would have as independent business people and agree to buy their products from suppliers and at prices specified by Tim Hortons. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:42 am
The California Supreme Court's decision in Strauss v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:25 pm by Matt Keenan
Likewise in People v Horton, officers thought they saw a metallic object that could have been a gun. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:25 pm by Matt Keenan
Likewise in People v Horton, officers thought they saw a metallic object that could have been a gun. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]