Search for: "People v. Hough" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2010, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
To put it mildly, things changed after the Supreme Court issued Garcetti v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:49 am by Edith Roberts
United States and United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Mississippi, which asks whether a prosecutor’s repeated use of peremptory challenges to remove black people from the jury pool violated the Constitution, the justices could “put some teeth into Batson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:56 am by Matt Brown
On the other hand, people who want judges to follow the text of laws, even when they help a defendant every now and again, should probably be a little worried whenever they end up with group from State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Judge Hand in Nichols, and Judge Charles Hough in Dymow v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
Both the Matlock and Randolph cases were about the search of real property, specifically a home shared by two people. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
For the purpose of this exercise, no evidence of the meaning in which the words were in fact understood is admissible; such evidence is irrelevant – see, for instance, Goddard LJ in Hough v London Express [read post]