Search for: "People v. Howard"
Results 301 - 320
of 929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
Barnes v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
West Virginia State School Board of Education v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:47 am
First up is Barton v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:56 pm
” I was asked about this for the WireReport story and was quoted as follows: “I can’t comment on any particular settlement because I don’t know thespecific facts,” Howard Knopf, a lawyer at Macera and Jarzyna, said in anemail. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
[Oral Argument in Moore v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 1:34 am
Known as “The Man Who Killed Jim Crow”, as the chief attorney for the National Association of Colored People (NAACP) he played a role in nearly every civil rights case before the Supreme Court between 1930 and Brown v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:27 am
This can also happen when people opt to stick with a public defender to represent them in a criminal matter. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:04 am
Lask.Thanks to Howard Bashman for the link. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:07 am
Howards (11-262). [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:22 am
Both decisions were issued by Judge Howard C. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
We failed you.Iqbal v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
8 May 2007, 12:18 pm
I suggested that one of the things I try to do with blogging -- and the group blogs to which I contribute, being "group blogs" consisting of people who often disagree, make this easier -- is to show my students that it remains possible, even in our red v. blue age, without retreating entirely to superficiality, to hash things out -- non-trivial things -- with people with whom one disagrees. [read post]
May “Jesus Is Not a Homophobe” T-Shirt Be Banned from Public High School as “Indecent” and “Sexual”?
4 Apr 2012, 12:36 pm
Howard Friedman (Religion Clause) and Thomas Riebs for the pointer. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:42 am
" See, Phalen v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
AirdayEst. of Airday v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks at one of next week’s cases, Hall v. [read post]
