Search for: "People v. Huffman" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am by bndmorris
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:06 pm
"Justice Huffman and the panel ultimately conclude that the discharge of the juror here was not okay. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:35 pm
  Similarly, yes, Justice Huffman is right that Mr. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by SHG
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
Betnar, 214 Or.App. 416, 166 P.3d 554 (Oregon Court of Appeals 2007), and People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:00 am by K.O. Herston
Coleman (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Grandparent Visitation Denied in Loudon: Huffman v. [read post]