Search for: "People v. Huffman" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2007, 12:55 pm
This was not known to be correct until after the work of Huffman and Kratschmer in 1990. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Mabry    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0100p.06 Huffman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:35 am
You can read the underlying majority opinion in Vega here, the underlying dissenting opinion here.Robert Huffman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:48 pm
Huffman and Justice Cynthia Aaron joined McDonald in his opinion.The case is People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by SHG
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:26 pm
This was not known to be correct until after the work of Huffman and Kratschmer in 1990. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]