Search for: "People v. Hughes" Results 121 - 140 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
On 10 June 2021 there was a unilateral statement in open court in the “Sun only” claim brought by Sir Simon Hughes. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by INFORRM
 The trial judge in Campbell v MGN was Mr Justice Morland since retired and in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Michael Lumer
Hugh Mo, the hearing officer, immediately declared from the bench that he would recommend to Commissioner Ward that Eppolito be cleared of all charges. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
However, there are also obvious disadvantages – it seems likely that more people would be encouraged to make complaints. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am by INFORRM
  However, there are also obvious disadvantages – it seems likely that more people would be encouraged to make complaints. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm by Peter Groves
The late Sir Hugh Laddie famously became a bit fed up with having to deal with general Chancery Division business, like landlord and tenant matters, when he was the Patents Court judge. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:51 am by Shawn Dominy
Some people report trouble with understanding the qualified immunity defense. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am by CMS
Google reviewed the relevant case law on CPR 19.6(1), arguing that the authorities (in particular, Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways plc [2011] Ch 345 and Rendlesham Estates plc. v Barr Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 3663) supported its position. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Whitney Cooney discusses the cert denial in Severson v. [read post]