Search for: "People v. Ireland" Results 281 - 300 of 741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2010, 6:03 am
(Cross posted at Human Rights in Ireland [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 7:27 am by Odia Kagan
And it’s an Art 12 GDPR transparency violation (said Data Protection Commission Ireland in WhatsApp & Facebook cases). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The petitioners have pulled together an experienced legal team, including Lord Anthony Gifford, counsel to the landmark case of Dudgeon v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Belfast Project is an oral history project of people involved in political organizations associated with the "Troubles" in Northern Ireland that started in 1969. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
Interestingly, the speaker noted that although ASI had no customers in the UK, 90% of the traffic to its website came from people in the UK (presumably looking for argos.co.uk).The Judge held that ASI’s site was not targeted at UK consumers and so ASI did not use the sign ARGOS within the UK (hence there could be no infringement). [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:40 am by INFORRM
The exceptional advocacy of the lawyers involved in the case of Indigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
For example, if Google Ireland is liable for the DST, it can challenge the tax based on the bilateral tax treaty concluded between France and Ireland because it is a tax resident of Ireland as defined by Article 2 of the Ireland-France Bilateral Income Tax Treaty and is entitled to the protection provided by the Treaty.[8] Considering the fact that all income tax treaties include substantively similar language and provisions and that most of the U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
It also suggested that the fact that other people had been using the mark did not affect the mark being distinctive to Tesco and that any third party use of the mark could actually amount to an infringement of its rights. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Ireland The Irish Times had a piece “Refugee tribunal member sues for defamation”. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
The collective action was aimed representing people in the Netherlands, but was extended to people who have moved abroad during the procedure, and these are under the opt-in rule. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm by Mark Walsh
Spain, Germany, Canada, Australia, Ireland, Mexico ask a citizenship question. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
 Under EU law in force since May 2011, people must give their consent before an anti-ad-blocker script can run and hide content on a page. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Equally, the European Court of Human Rights considers that the principles set out in the preamble to the Convention refers to the Convention as a whole (see,  inter alia , ECHR rulings  Engel and Others v. the Netherlands on June 8, 1976, Klass and Others v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Ireland The judgment in the remarkable defamation case of Christie v. [read post]