Search for: "People v. Jackson (1985)" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jill Lepore Oliver Wendell Holmes was born in 1841, when Andrew Jackson was president. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Monika U. Ehrman
” In 1985, the Supreme Court upheld this approach in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
Jackson also indicated that she would have granted review in Lombardo v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
From Justice Jackson's opinion, joined by Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of certiorari today in Harness v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It is through them that the living spirits of our people, of our history, of our culture interact and interface with us. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Lucey: Right to effective assistance of counsel extended to appeal process. 1985 Hill v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am by jonathanturley
” (Notably, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson took the same position against Roe as super precedent.). [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, even liberal jurists now play the game, as now-Judge/Justice-to-be Jackson illustrated last month. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in questioning Judge Jackson last week, Texas Senator John Cornyn repeatedly referred to the right to same-sex marriage, which the Supreme Court recognized in Obergefell v. [read post]