Search for: "People v. Jackson (1992)" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am by Charles Szafir
Constitution Establishment Clause violation when the program is neutral to religion); Jackson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by Schachtman
How many other people were subjected to this protocol? [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But here’s the problem:  The Twenty-Seventh Amendment (proposed in 1789, but not ratified until 1992) says:  “No law, varying the compensation for the services of Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election for Representatives shall have occurred. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  Interestingly, the last time NBC/WSJ asked the question, back in May of 1992, the split was 28/54, with almost twice as many people saying the Court was too conservative as opposed to too liberal. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Jackson (1969) (being a sampling of his judicial opinions). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix Chambers
There is no doubt, however, that the UK Parliament has the power to make arrangements for referendums anywhere within the UK on such issues as it wishes to consult the people on. [read post]