Search for: "People v. Jacobsen" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
Jacobsen (drug testing a small amount of white powder) and U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984) (`[l]etters and other sealed packages are in the general class of effects in which the public . . . has a legitimate expectation of privacy’). . . . [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
It does not actually put people on notice that it prohibits such advertisements. [read post]