Search for: "People v. Jacobsen"
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:17 pm
First, there was the ruling in Jacobsen V. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
See Weinberg v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 2:36 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:57 am
Katzer, who lost the case, appealed the ruling, and it made its way to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), who have produced a decision that seems to please most people, except me of course. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 11:35 pm
In Jacobsen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:27 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:31 am
Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 113 (1984)). [read post]
