Search for: "People v. James"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
In Upsolve v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am
Complaint, Doe v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
I told you he meant the people outside. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:02 am
See James S. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:51 am
Also note that if the Garcia v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
Speakers will include Judge James Boasberg, Judge Timothy Dyk, Jelahn Stewart and Elizabeth Woodcock. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
When opposing counsel, Charles Chockley, asked the plaintiff, Benjamin Sipes, "Can you tell from looking at these people whether they are colored people or white people? [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
James (1971) – Michele Estrin GilmanA Tragedy of Two Americas: Jefferson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:02 pm
The Solicitor General's Office has filed a brief in opposition to the petition for certiorari that was filed by James E. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
” [Citations]; see also People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
In May 2017, President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:10 am
D.C. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am
v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Court of Appeals's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
Trials are always about people. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:10 am
Infostream Group Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
[Volokh v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]