Search for: "People v. James" Results 141 - 160 of 4,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2008, 7:52 am
James Otero, sitting in the Central District of California, who showed genuine concern over the one-sidedness of RIAA litigation. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 6:01 pm
Orange County Criminal Court Judge James Marion should have known that a decompensating pro per criminal defendant was not competent when he had a history of severe, chronic mental health problems and presented a defense that his victim was not human, says the Court of Appeal Fourth District Division 3 in its opinon in People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
On November 19, 2010, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York heard the case of the People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:15 am by John Cordani
But the Federal Circuit’s decision in Lite-Netics, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 5:25 pm by Ilya Somin
Obama hoped to find in a successor, the president noted “a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:56 am by Orin Kerr
I believe that no criminal defendant has won a Supreme Court case on the scope of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule since 1990, when the court handed down James v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
Justice Breyer wrote the majority opinion.)Second argument session, beginning 10/30/200612 cases argued, with 9 [10] opinions issued to date(One case remaining is James v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:41 am
 They lose the appeal and get a bit of sass directed their way as a bonus.So let's work on getting James "Nonplussed" Richman his mojo back, people. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:06 pm
 It's not one of the leading opinions on summary judgment (obviously), but it's nonetheless used as a concrete example of how district courts are supposed to evaluate evidentiary conflicts in determining whether there's a genuine issue of material fact for trial.For people my age, it's a high-profile case. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
As far as you could tell from the opinion, this is a run-of-the-mill case that just so happens to involve one of the many anonymous people in this world called Orenthal James Simpson.Anyway, on the merits, Justice Willhite is clearly and unambiguously right that California has personal jurisdiction to renew a money judgment as an extension of the original jurisdiction over the tort. [read post]