Search for: "People v. Jarvis"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Jarvis, The Expelled Law Student: A Case Law Survey (2022). 48. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Further, as this Court observed in Jarvis, Parliament’s purposes in enacting the voyeurism offence were to protect individuals’ privacy and sexual integrity. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:28 am
Conclusion Historically, there has been little case law emerging from Wales on its diverging housing law – virtually no reported higher court litigation followed the Housing (Wales) Act 2014 (other than the notable Jarvis v Evans – see NL’s report here). [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:21 am
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:28 am
There is a case from Ontario called R. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
(And yes, I am aware of similarities to Judith Jarvis Thompson’s violinist.) [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada determined that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location, or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed (R v Jarvis 2019 SCC). [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
An ICO investigation, prompted by complaints from the public, found the firm made repeated nuisance calls to people about PPI. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:11 am
July Justin Bates wrote a post for us on a new case, Jarvis v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, in Winston v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Bioethics 56 (2010) Judith Jarvis Thomson, Rights and Deaths, 2 Phil. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
Background In People ex rel. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
That said, … Robichaud’s Criminal Law BlogHeather’s Legal Summaries: R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 A school teacher secretly recorded his female students’ breasts with a camera pen while they were engaged in normal activities at school. [read post]
