Search for: "People v. Jennings"
Results 41 - 60
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2018, 10:58 am
Citing Wong v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
Jennings encouraged supporters and affiliates to gather near drop boxes in groups of "[n]o less than 8 people" to track and deter these supposed "mules. [read post]
Texas' new sex offender law misplaces focus on stranger danger, could make victimization more likely
21 Oct 2007, 11:25 pm
"Unfortunately, the majority of sex crimes involve people like 'Uncle Jimmy,' " he said, "and Uncle Jimmy's not a monster. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:27 am
In 2001, just months after Perry's ascension to Governor, the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
For instance, the district court gives the strong impression that then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki used the words “legal consequences” in purportedly threatening social media companies. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Jennings v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 4:30 pm
People v Wheeler, 2023 WL 5622596 (CA App. 8/4/2023) [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:19 pm
People v Jennings, 2007 NY Slip Op 3028, 2007 N.Y. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
The people, not the government, bear the responsibility to discern the truth. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:59 pm
People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:45 pm
Jennings v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
Stanley v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
” NY Times“All six Republican appointees on the Supreme Court have long signaled that they have qualms with the Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:42 am
In People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 11:00 am
Co. vs Jennings, 190 Ill. 478, 484. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Jennings, 968 So. 2d 694 (Fla.4th DCA 2007)); see also State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 7:03 am
Blinken will meet with Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
