Search for: "People v. Johnson" Results 221 - 240 of 1,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
Senator Philip Hart (D-Michigan) remarked that people might have the “accurate impression that U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:05 am by Tessa Shepperson
I am very much obliged to Linda Howard, from the Residential Property Litigation team at Shoosmiths Solicitors who has kindly sent me the approved Judgement for the Court of Appeal decision in Johnson v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Nothing in the statute restricts its application solely to harmful conduct directed at children (see, People v Bergerson, 17 [95 N.Y.2d 372] NY2d 398, 401 [noting that the prior version of statute was intended to be broad in scope]). [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:11 am by Brian Shiffrin
In that respect, this case is more analogous to our holding in People v Johnson (14 NY3d 483 [2010]). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:35 am
Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal held in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 11:44 am by Monroe Freedman
”As we mark the fiftieth anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
Dean Johnson has published a number of books and articles on immigration law, including Opening the Floodgates?  [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Johnson & Johnson, the plaintiff’s lawyer accused Johnson & Johnson of having “rigged” regulatory agencies to ignore the dangers of talc.5 The argument was apparently effective and it has been repeated in another Missouri trial, in Swann v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
They say Johnson is welcome to attend, but not to hand out literature, relying on the Supreme Court decision in Hurley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
Fifty years ago today, President Johnson signed the most important legislation of modern American history, the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:30 am
 Concurring in Whitney v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2012, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., Nov. 30, 2012), a New York trial court held that an inmate was denied due process when his parole violation hearing was held in abstentia, but the reason for his absence was his Muslim Friday religious observance.In Johnson v. [read post]