Search for: "People v. Johnson" Results 21 - 40 of 1,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2016, 7:31 am by David Markus
Significant swings in mandatory sentence zones — from up to 10 years to 15 years to life — turn on the answer.The court ruled a year ago in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
As linked on Sentencing Law & Policy here, the Colorado Supreme Court has come out with an opinion in People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:28 pm
The husband -- George Edward Johnson -- is 64 years old.Proof positive that profound irrationality knows no defined bounds. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
This was done with a view to safeguarding the rights of other people in Mr Johnson’s position, which might give rise to “all sorts of current consequences. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm by Don Jacobs
She wanted to encourage other people, especially women attorneys, to consider a judicial career. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm by Don Jacobs
She wanted to encourage other people, especially women attorneys, to consider a judicial career. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
During the congressional election campaign later that year, Johnson decided to take his case to the American people, and pressured Grant to accompany him. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
During the congressional election campaign later that year, Johnson decided to take his case to the American people, and pressured Grant to accompany him. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:39 am
People were coming and going through the parking lot as parents picked up their children from the childcare center.Defendant then asked for the return of some of his fishing gear from Henderson‘s car and began carrying his possessions from the trunk of her car to the trunk of his car. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
A defendant need not commit an affirmative act directed at a child (see People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 591 [2002]; People v Johnson, 95 NY2d 368, 371-372 [2002]) nor cause actual harm to a child (see Johnson, 95 NY2d at 371; see also People v Duenas, 190 Misc 2d 801 [App Term, 2d Dept 2002]) to be guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. [read post]