Search for: "People v. Johnson" Results 61 - 80 of 2,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 4:34 pm by Justin Walsh
You’ve seen one post today on how Jim Johnson will put profits over people. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:11 pm by Kristina Araya
In People v Johnson, No. 295664, the Court of Appeals affirmed Johnson’s conviction and sentence on charges of possession with intent to deliver marijuana and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:21 pm by Richard Primus
  If Gary Johnson had said "I'd want Justices who applied the jurisprudence we associate with Lochner v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 10:11 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
Embry, Judge Sutton notes the differing opinions on whether Johnson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm by JT
People v Johnson, 2012 NY Slip Op 02213 (4th Dept. 2012) “Following entry of the order granting that part of defendant’s motion, the People moved for leave to reargue with respect thereto. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is giving a speech today at the Yale Law School. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:33 pm by Ilya Somin
He also believes that Kelo v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:25 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Regular readers of this blog may remember my report on the case of Johnson v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:33 am by Rebecca Jeschke
In Johnson, the defendant was allegedly linked to a series of crimes by a software program called TrueAllele, used to evaluate complex mixtures of DNA samples from multiple people. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:11 pm
Michigan Lawyers Weekly, The Oakland Press and the Detroit Legal News recently published my letter on Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
The ruse succeeded and Lund told Johnson his name. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court of Appeals has repeatedly held that a prospective juror with actual bias, such as an opinion that the defendant is guilty, is qualified to serve on a jury as long as gives an unequivocal assurance she can be fair and impartial (People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614 [2000]). [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:44 am by Justin Walsh
  But Justice Jim Johnson put those laws and the people they protect at risk. [read post]