Search for: "People v. Johnson (1980)" Results 1 - 20 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2010, 11:39 am
"Defendant, whose nickname was 'Mookie,' and the victim, Nicole Henderson, had grown up in the same neighborhood in Oakland and had been friends since Henderson‘s teenage years in the late 1980‘s. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Ryan Scoville
For example, Robert Wood Johnson IV—the ambassador to the United Kingdom—co-owns the New York Jets. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363… [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 7:16 pm
He chose a position between the liberal Democrats and George Wallace, supporting Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
On my way to writing a post applying the UK Supreme Court’s decision on the Boris Johnson prorogation to the City of Toronto decision upholding the province’s reduction of wards, I decided to take a detour to examine the College of Midwives of British Columbia v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Johnson, 910 F.2d 1506 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1051, 111 S.Ct. 764, 112 L.Ed.2d 783 (1991); United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Johnson & Johnson, the plaintiff’s lawyer accused Johnson & Johnson of having “rigged” regulatory agencies to ignore the dangers of talc.5 The argument was apparently effective and it has been repeated in another Missouri trial, in Swann v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Just ask the Los Angeles City Attorney after the recent decision by the California Court of Appeals in The People v. [read post]