Search for: "People v. Johnson (1980)" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2010, 11:39 am
"Defendant, whose nickname was 'Mookie,' and the victim, Nicole Henderson, had grown up in the same neighborhood in Oakland and had been friends since Henderson‘s teenage years in the late 1980‘s. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363… [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 7:16 pm
He chose a position between the liberal Democrats and George Wallace, supporting Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:20 am by Scott Bomboy
Government lawyers appealed directly to the Supreme Court, and the same Justices who heard the Johnson case considered United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Johnson, 910 F.2d 1506 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1051, 111 S.Ct. 764, 112 L.Ed.2d 783 (1991); United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Johnson & Johnson, the plaintiff’s lawyer accused Johnson & Johnson of having “rigged” regulatory agencies to ignore the dangers of talc.5 The argument was apparently effective and it has been repeated in another Missouri trial, in Swann v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by Rosalind English
Dryden and Others v Johnson Matthey [2018] UKSC 18 – read judgment  We are all made of stuff, and that stuff is not inert because it’s organic matter. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:05 pm by S2KM Limited
" These "negative" forces include predicted secondary market "chaos" resulting from the Washington Square v. [read post]