Search for: "People v. Jones"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2023, 4:13 pm
This seems to me to be largely a "forgot to put it on the record" problem.The judge dismissed the jury after it rendered its guilty verdict, but forgot that the jury hadn't yet decided whether the defendant had been previously convicted of a serious felony, which was one of the charged enhancements. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:12 am
Under Jones v Firkin Flood a conflict of interests can vitiate a trustee’s otherwise reasonable decision. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
See People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
The Information Commissioner has lauded the judgment, saying protecting the privacy rights of “people (who) may not even be aware those rights exist” was a core function of the ICO. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Why § 230 Likely Doesn't Provide Immunity for Libels Composed by ChatGPT, Bard, etc.
27 Mar 2023, 9:30 am
LeadClick Media, LLC, 838 F.3d 158, 174 (2d Cir. 2016); Jones v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
Jones that “[o]ur freedoms to engage in various activities also include the freedom not to do so. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Or are they representing and serving a class of people not reflecting the diversity of the public? [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
PimEyes, a tool purporting to help people track their web presence, has been accused of scraping images of deceased persons to populate its database. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:06 am
Indeed, he insisted that other people within the company would be better suited to answer questions regarding certain topics. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
From Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion yesterday in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:43 pm
So we turn to the recent case coming out of the Georgia Court of Appeals in the 2023 case of Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:23 pm
(My article on Cooper v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:58 pm
Jones, as MyJr to pass that along to you. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
/UK sanctions against the Trickbot cybercrime group, confirmation that Twitter’s sale will not be investigated by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), and the latest on Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In City of Richmond v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:56 am
Most people would simply prefer to be finished with their ex-spouse instead of paying their ex-spouse monthly or, conversely, the ex-spouse hoping they will be paid every month. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:36 am
He was joined by Reagan-appointee Judge Edith Jones and Judge James Ho, another Trump appointee who also wrote a concurrence. [read post]