Search for: "People v. Jones" Results 221 - 240 of 2,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2014, 2:04 pm by Harold O'Grady
After the recent July 16, 2014 Order Declaring California’s Death Penalty System Unconstitutional by the United States District Court for the Central District Of California in the case of Jones v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm by Samantha Barbas
"Privacy" was about shielding people from publicity they found unfavorable, misrepresentative, or annoying -- that clashed with how they wanted to be known to others.In Jones v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:34 pm
A memorandum formally reprimanding Campbell for these actions stated that she “verbally ragged” a security officer and students, and it instructed her not to address people on campus “in a yelling or ragging manner. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The word “objection” alone was insufficient to preserve the issue for our review"]; People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:38 am by Dan Bressler
” “Housing is a Human Right and others told the court Wednesday that Jones Day previously represented People’s Homeless Task Force pro bono in a similar lawsuit, saying that the two organizations comprised substantially the same people and had overlapping missions. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
The longer they delay, the more that it looks like they share incestuous relationships with the very people they are suppose to regulate. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 3:55 pm by Joe Austin, E.D. Tenn.
After initially deciding the case in an unpublished order, the Sixth Circuit later ordered publication of its decision in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:58 am by Lyle Denniston
The ruling came in the case of Whitewood v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 Such a motion is waived, however, if not made within five days of arraignment (see also, People v Jones, 187 AD2d 750 [3rd Dept 1992], lv den, 81 NY2d 790 [1993]), although in some cases, discussed below, that five-day deadline may be extended. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:21 am
  In yesterday's oral argument, we saw a few of those interesting morsels, which may serve as something of a preview for questions in Jones v. [read post]