Search for: "People v. Jones"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2007, 5:52 am
People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
People v Jones, 2007 NY Slip Op 3391, 2007 N.Y. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:32 pm
The opinions are United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:35 pm
Jones v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:18 am
I myself am more open to campaign contribution limits than he (or his former boss, Justice Thomas) is; I explain my thinking briefly in this article, which shows me to be one of the few people who thinks Buckley v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:18 pm
28 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
” Jones, 132 S.Ct. at 950, citing Katz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:13 am
Jones (PDF)Interestingly, the court did not rely at all on the "reasonable expectation of privacy" formulation adopted by the court in 1967 in Katz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
In California v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
Twitter, Jones v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
"); Townley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:45 am
Since the landmark case of Jones v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 8:14 am
Jones v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 8:14 am
Jones v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am
The US Supreme Court has sent the cases of two Arizona murderers, Danny Jones and Edward Schad, back to the Ninth Circuit to do over in light of the Supreme Court's April 5 decision in another Ninth Circuit capital case, Cullen v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
JonesIn United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
The facts of this case suggest to me that the Second Circuit was not about to give this guy any leeway.The case is Jones v. [read post]