Search for: "People v. Jones (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
Indeed, three years after Jones, in Griffin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by Tom Goldstein
Having reflected more on the decision, I now think that in some respects Jones is still less of a pro-privacy ruling than many people initially thought. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983) which could have been used as precedent. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:04 pm by Harold O'Grady
After the recent July 16, 2014 Order Declaring California’s Death Penalty System Unconstitutional by the United States District Court for the Central District Of California in the case of Jones v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am by Phil Dixon
The facts in Glisson involved a series of sales of oxycodone, an opiate, by the defendant to an undercover agent in Jones County. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 Where a defendant is incapacitated at the time of the presentation to the grand jury, the indictment may be dismissed with leave to represent (People v Bakulas, 95 AD2d 813 [2nd Dept 1983]). [read post]