Search for: "People v. Jordan" Results 301 - 320 of 571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
| Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers | Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party | The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision | Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 1:32 am
| Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers | Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party | The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision | Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
| Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers | Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party | The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision | Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
I Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers I Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party I The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision I Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson
Dimaya contends that, in seeking to bar vagueness challenges to the immigration laws, the government is seeking nothing less than to overrule the court’s 1951 decision in Jordan v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
"* The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark DecisionFormer GuestKat Mike Mireles and Kat friend Henry Liao dicuss the fresh court decision (from the Supreme People’s Court of China) on the Michael Jordan trade mark/name-personality case. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:23 am by The CGCP Team
Jordan Corrente Beck (Co-Managing Editor, CGCP; Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York) and Mr. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:05 am by Robichaud
 This long-needed impetus stems from the recent Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
City of Miami and Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  This role was exposed in last week’s judgment in R v Norman ([2016] EWCA Crim 1564) which was discussed on the Panopticon blog Roy Greenslade in the Guardian said that the “wrong people were prosecuted over journalists’ payments to police,” and that the police should have been investigating Rupert Murdoch’s publishing business instead of France. [read post]