Search for: "People v. Jordan"
Results 321 - 340
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
In December last year, Jordan secured a partial victory: the People’s Supreme Court in China ruled that 乔丹 was primarily associated with Jordan the person, not the company, and cancelled these marks. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
In December last year, Jordan secured a partial victory: the People’s Supreme Court in China ruled that 乔丹 was primarily associated with Jordan the person, not the company, and cancelled these marks. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:03 pm
(See, e.g., Jordan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 8:08 am
Jordan issue alone. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:19 am
In Fry v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
| Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers | Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party | The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision | Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am
Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 1:32 am
| Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers | Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party | The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision | Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
Johnston v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
| Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers | Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party | The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision | Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
I Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers I Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party I The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision I Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am
Dimaya contends that, in seeking to bar vagueness challenges to the immigration laws, the government is seeking nothing less than to overrule the court’s 1951 decision in Jordan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
Jordan type situation? [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
Put it this way: virtually no one is going to look at a R. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
"* The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark DecisionFormer GuestKat Mike Mireles and Kat friend Henry Liao dicuss the fresh court decision (from the Supreme People’s Court of China) on the Michael Jordan trade mark/name-personality case. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:23 am
Jordan Corrente Beck (Co-Managing Editor, CGCP; Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York) and Mr. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
The post JORDAN v. [read post]
