Search for: "People v. Jordan" Results 101 - 120 of 665
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
The next day, the defendant made several statements to various people that he had killed a woman with a bat. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Government has added two new duties to the proposed Online Safety Bill  that are aimed at protecting people against anonymous online abuse. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
People have, for example, ‘imaginary friends’, but they rarely have ‘imaginaries’ (Brigitte Nerlich, Imagining imaginaries, University of Nottingham Blog (23 April 2015) with a nice summary explanation of the evolution and expansion of the term within the social sciences)Whatever its pedigree, the term is useful here. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Elena Kagan and Alan Rozenshtein analyzed the five-hour Thompson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Johnson, 921 F.3d 991, 1010 (11th Cir. 2019) (en banc) (Jordan, J., dissenting) (when it comes to precedent with a "shaky originalist foundation . . . there is always the option of declining to broaden it—of refusing to extend it one inch beyond its previous contours"); People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Gould v Jordan (No.2) [2021] FCA 1289 White J held that the impugned statements referred to the plaintiff and conveyed defamatory imputations but that they were made on an occasion of qualified privilege. [read post]
 For further explanation, do not hesitate to contact Michael Jordan for no cost legal advice. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That, in turn, led to his lawyers mounting a number of challenges in courts across the country, even reaching the Supreme Court in the case of Texas v. [read post]